Question: Effective medical communication answers one specific question.
Quickbite for the busy: Answer only one main question per document.
Do you remember the year 2005? I don't, except that I had braces, long hair and went to see "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy".
My expections were low, I thought the title was really stupid. Imagine my surprise when I found myself crying of laughter for 110 minutes and running for the next bookstore to purchase the book.
Its story provides the big answer: “Of Life. The Universe. Everything.” And the answer is fourty-two.[1]
Unless your big problem of life, the universe and everything happens to be six times seven, this answer is not particularly useful. The same is true in medical communication:
Medical communication without a specific question in mind is “almost, but not quite, completely useless”.[1]
Give your audience a useful answer to one interesting question. This will notably increase the probability that they will actually read it.[2]
How specific should I be?
Unless you are in the lucky position where people approach you and ask good questions, you have to come up with an interesting question yourself. The twist: it must be interesting and useful to your reader.
If your topic is too broad, it's not useful. If it's too narrow, it will help fewer readers. Figure 1 shows a specificity axis. While the specificity of the question increases from left to right, so does its potential usefulness. The number of people who find the answer helpful, however, decreases. I recommend aiming at the red area.
Figure 1: Specificity axis. The specificity of the question increases from left to right, so does its potential usefulness. The potential audience, however, decreases.
Why should I focus on one question when I could answer one hundred questions with one document?
Busy healthcare professionals who seek to make a specific treatment decision will not waste time plowing through a pile of data that may or may not contain a solution to their problem. In fact, they can't.
Allen and Harkins surveyed an acute medical unit in a relatively quiet period. They saw 18 patients with 44 diagnoses. Reading the respective clinical practice guidelines for those diagnoses (3679 pages) would take 122 hours.[3] This sounds neither efficient, nor effective. It sounds impossible.
How can I find out which questions are interesting and useful?
You will be buried in data after your research. Some of which will be fascinating, breathtaking, provocative, unusual, amazing, eye-opening, amusing – to you. It doesn’t really matter. There is only one entity that defines what is interesting to your audience: your audience.
The following strategies will help you hone your questions:
Listen to your reader or somebody who talks to them.
Find out what they have asked about in similar areas.
Read effective medical information and evaluate its specificity.
Consistently finding the best question to answer is herculean, but don’t worry, I’m here to help.
References:
[1] Douglas A. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. New York: Del Rey® Books; 2005.
[2] Cutts M. Oxford Guide to Plain English. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2020. Chapter 2, Organizing your material in a reader-centered structure; p.10.
[3] Allen D, Harkins KJ. Too much guidance? Lancet. 2005 May 21-27;365(9473):1768. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66578-6. PMID: 15910948.
Do you have comments, doubts or (specific) questions for me?
… if you want to take a more detailed look into specific questions together.
See you soon, best wishes